Daily Updates!
Stay informed of NEWEST chapters of Scholar’s Advanced Technological System with notification directly sent to your email.
LOG IN
What ghost doesn't pass is?
Surprise, not only Louwen Xuan also has land Zhou the students, is land Zhou, a little cannot believe the content on this mail.
After the edit opinion of Professor Faltings carefully read one, land Zhou roughly understood his meaning.
According to the viewpoint of Professor Faltings, he thinks that in the paper some positions have the great dispute, causing the entire chapter paper core component to have the serious proof flaw, being not enough to prove, when the E value is infinitesimal, in the re (s ) ≥ 1-e region does not have Zeta function the non-vanishing ordinary.
To be honest, land Zhouxie this paper, was returned the request to reorganize for the first time.
Stood also sees the tail in behind of land boat this edit opinion from the beginning, Louwen Xuan swallowed a saliva to ask.
„Proof existing problem?”
land Zhou shakes the head: „Now drew the conclusion also too early, when I had a look to say again.”
Hears these words, sits sets upright the ear is listening to what Changwen in side, the pen revolutions has almost not flown the hand is relaying.
Ok.
Others receive the reply that the suggestion reorganized, the first response changed to finish up honestly, when changed when to the reviewer comfortably the manuscript, this big shot must look said again......
Thinks of here, in what Changwen the heart is also an entire feeling.
The big shot worthily are the big shot......
When he also had well such flamboyant......
Has not noticed own several students to think anything.
Said after those words, land Zhou then bends the waist, in the cabinet from the desk turned out the previous certificate would-be Riemann hypothesis the hitting manuscript for printing of that paper, compares position that Professor Faltings is pointing out, inspected one after another.
Because cannot understand analytic theory of numbers type of profound thing completely, a Louwen Xuan such face compels to stand behind the land boat ignorant, the appearance that pretending to understand, waits for the result of landing boat peacefully.
Then, passed for ten minutes is so long probably.
When Louwen Xuan started to have the yawn quickly, the land boat suddenly paper about in beginning, lost by the stationery that pack on the table.
Saw with own eyes that land Zhou looked, Louwen Xuan asked hastily curiously.
„Finally how?”
land Zhou shakes the head.
„I do not think I write has the issue.”
Louwen Xuan hesitated, asked: „Was that...... Professor Faltings makes a mistake?”
Said these words time, his 1 energy did not have at heart.
That is Professor Faltings, Grothendieck later the first person of mathematics circles.
On in the influence of mathematics circles, perhaps own teacher Edward Weiteng must greatly.
But this venerable temperament strangely is also becomes famous, does not have Weiteng is so good in the personal connection of academic circle and that's the end.
„Now discussed that who was wrong to whom also too early,” stood from the chair, stopped the moment, land Zhou continued saying that „I can communicate this issue with Professor Faltings.”
„Communicates perhaps was a little difficult...... he to recognize the thing basically not to change with Professor Faltings, moreover......” hesitant, Louwen Xuan opened the mouth to remind, „......, if you had no way to convince him, perhaps will be taunted by him unceasingly.”
„These secondary,” land boat does not care said that „, if he is right, I correct and that's the end. If I am right, I will not change a symbol.”
Louwen Xuan asked back: „If anyone of you cannot convince who?”
This situation in the mathematics circles is also quite common, when the academic standards of two people are almost the same, right to speak extreme being close in academic circle, really who is also hard to convince anyone in some specious issues.
After all more penetrates into the research of frontier, many things do not seem like like it is so obvious. Sometimes regarding the same issue, two different schools of thought has two different viewpoints, and argued some time, this situation also possibly exists.
Naturally, the charm of math also just lies in this.
Has the great dispute, never has a dispute to continue permanently, a correct side will emerge from the crowd forever. Even if historically had led to three mathematical crises, almost shook the foundation of entire mathematical building, but people found an appropriate way finally, reduced and solved all disputes.
„Whose if no one can convince......”
Stopped the moment, the land boat continues to say calmly.
„That looked that we who can convince others is.”
......
Wall that in this world has not ventilated forever.
Especially when the nearby of this wall, is lying one crowd of the time of lifeform of craving in the Eight Trigrams (gossip).
Received " Math Yearly journal » edit opinion in the land boat that night, on mathoverflow then had an important matter.
Some people explode suddenly, land Zhou delivers in «Math Yearly journal» on that about „the would-be Riemann hypothesis” the paper of proof, was hit by reviewer Professor Faltings.
This news comes out, immediately detonated the topic of entire forum, so long as almost opens the forum, then can see that some people enthusiastically are discussing this matter.
【Was Professor land resisted the manuscript unexpectedly?! Sun hit the west side to come out!】
【I have said that his proof has the serious defect, you spurt me. Now takes a look, not only I alone believe, even Professor Faltings also thinks, you do spurt? Idiots!】
【Resists the manuscript is very actually common? Even the top scholar, in the paper will still present some small slight defects unavoidably.】
【This does not resist the manuscript is so simple, haven't you seen that screenshot? Resists the expression of manuscript not to have some small slight defects is so simple, but is „core proof part has major flaw”. You know that what this does mean? Generally speaking presented these words to mean, if you cannot make the satisfying supplement to explain, was not next time hits to make you reorganize, but threw into the waste basket directly!】
【Regardless how saying that this is unusual......】
【Nothing is unusual, after all the reviewer is Faltings. This old fogy does not speak the favor of becoming famous, otherwise he will unable to mix in Princeton, ran back Germany to teach...... this saying to queer, please permit my anonymous.】
【......】
Actually the strict sense, the reviewer edit flow should be the strict security, but how does not know, some screenshots of that edit opinion reply, actually by which bored person divulging.
«Math Yearly journal» editorial department after discovering this matter, manager who immediately relates the mathoverflow forum, but the manager who m forum also coordinated to delete very much disclosed the post. But Internet this type of thing is this, once a secret is known by over two people, then it was impossible to be called is the secret.
Let alone the mathematics circles was really the too deficient Eight Trigrams (gossip), the sesame seed big point small matter can cause discussion of entire academic circle.
Do not say that but is Faltings and experts of land boat these two big shot ranks, the difficult problem of Riemann hypothesis this nuclear bomb level the focus of argument revolves......
The argument continued entire three days, both litigants have not responded.
Forum that on a not this young scholar can go, as for another, although has the account number, but disdains in that person of explanation probably.
When discussed that ferments continually, when people discussed that the landing boat or Faltings will have anything further acts, beyond public opinion vortex Jinling University, suddenly in the official site has spread a blockbuster news.
The content of news is very short, short hundred come the character.
However in which information content, is huge has not responded to almost all people.
【On December 18, our school will launch in the old campus auditorium „would-be Riemann hypothesis proof” -themed academic conference by, and question reply scholar's from all walks of life question that in the proof process has. At present the registration channel has opened, has the person who the interest participates in please before the closing date on December 7, submits the registration information.】
【Public lecture speaking person: land Zhou( academician)】
Almost on the same day that this news was put......
The entire mathematics circles, seethed with excitement immediately!
Enter your email address that you used to register. We'll send you an email with detailed steps to reset your password.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Already a member? Log In
Stay informed of NEWEST chapters of Scholar’s Advanced Technological System with notification directly sent to your email.